Monday, November 26, 2012

BLOG XI
Fighting for Life
            The poem of  Dylan Thomas, Do Not Go Gentle into that  Good Night, is about death and how four kinds of men should fight for live, even though they have  had no a good life. I believe the poem’s speaker is related to the author because it is a plea for Thomas father who is possible dying. So the poem has a speaker: Thomas, a listener: his father, and a situation: a dying person (his father). Because of  that Thomas present to his father this kind of men in this particular poem named, villanelle.
            The structure of this poem , four tercets and a concluding quatrain, let Thomas present four kind of men to his dying father because he believes that it would help his father continue fighting for his life. The first category of men is the wise: “Though wise men at their end know dark is right” (line 4).Thomas believes these men are conscious of death, and they see it such as a natural thing of life. But, also Thomas says that they are not in accordance with death because they do not feel that they write his history in world’s memory: “Because their words had forked no lightning” (line 5); so they should fight death until they get from life what they want.
            The second kind of men is: “Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright” (line 7); Thomas believes that these men in their last years of their lives could feel that their achievements are not enough to leave a good impression in live: “Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay” (line 8); so they should protest against death  until their deeds were strong enough to let a record in the world.
            The third kind of men is: “Wild men, near death, who caught and sang the sun in flight” (line 10). These men enjoy a lot of life but with no sense. They just live in a wild way life, but they do not have anything back from it. But when they realize the cruelty of wasted life is late to take a life’s sense: “And learn too late, they grieved it on its way” (line 11). Even though they waste life, they have the right to fight for it: “Do not go gentle into that good night.” (line 12)
            The fourth kind of men is: “Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight” (line 13). Even though they are in their last years of life, they should fight for a new chance of living. Never is late to be against death, because the important thing is fighting and never lose hope: “Rage, rage against the dying of the light” (line 15). It does not matter your age, fighting for live is a right for every one. Never is late for fighting death, so Thomas father should take this in his mind and do not let death win the race.
            The last stanza is a Thomas’ plea to his father. He is asking his father for strength, and he urges his father for more ambition about life: “Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray” (line 17). Through out all four examples of men above presented, Thomas encourages his father for living. Never is late to fight death even though people have or not good deeds, history, or youth.  The repetition of the these two verses: “Do not go gentle into that good night/ Rage, rage against the dying of the light” makes outline the importance of fighting death even though you do feel the right to do it.

Sunday, November 18, 2012

BLOG X


Is War Honorable?
            Each person need some kind of incentive to make himself satisfied in life.  It is just to look for what it makes us happy and useful in world. For example, the poem of Dulce et Decorum Est explains how individuals in war times think that war makes them honorable and useful to their fatherland. But, the poet asks in an ironic way if war is really an honorable way for dying just because you help your fatherland. The title suggest that the poem is about honor and war’s useful for each country, but when the poet starts to describe the cruelty of war, the reader realizes the title is an ironic way to outline how much the war is useless.
            The war does not show any compassion for its helpers, instead she is cruel with them and makes them feel inferior in life: “Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,/ Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge, / till on the haunting flares we turned our backs/ and towards our distant rest began to trudge./ Men marched asleep./ Many had lost their boots/ but limped on blood-shod” (625). This image draw the adversities that all soldiers have to  suffer  just to make happy their fatherland. Is this honorable? Well, it is just a cruel way to protect what they believe is correct. But this quotation just introduce the reader to the war’s scenario because the poet after that he describes how a man died drowned: “And watch the white eyes writhing in his face./ His hanging face, like a devil’s jolt, the blood/ Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,/ Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud/ Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues” (625-626). This person is just one picture of a bunch of deaths in a similar way, but it is an honor issue. “innocent tongues” makes me think about war’s useless in world because innocent people died just to give empowered people glory, but they do not receive any; they only have like a payment: death which nobody is going to remember. The poet reaffirms his idea about the misunderstanding of glory when he make the speaker say to his friend: “you would not tell with such high zest/ To children ardent for some desperate glory,/ The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori” (626). Dying in war is not an honorable way, instead it is useless way to obtain glory because each on that ardent children are going to died and are going to be forgotten. They are only one more number of dead people. War is just an ironic way of dying with no glory.

Monday, November 12, 2012

BLOG IX
?
This blog is named ? because I do not know what title choose. First, it is really hard to me read poetry because the language, and second because I do not like it. It is not about genre; it is about feelings. I consider that when you choose a poem or you like it; it is because it has something in common with you. It reflects your soul, so your inner can be at every one’s eyes, and that is nothing pleasant for me.  But I have to choose two, so I choose “Cargoes” written by John Masefield and “Anthem for Doomed Youth” by Wilfred Owen because they have interesting images which can makes think about the usefulness of conquers in differents periond of history or we can hear each sound that the poet want us to hear for understanding in a better way the pain of death.
Masefield in his poem talks about three kinds of cargoes. Each stanza is specifying the materials that each vessel transports. To reaffirm each the materials, each second line of each stanza begins with: Rowing, Dipping, Butting. The first one is about commerce because it only talks about ivory, sandalwood, cedar wood, and white wine.  These materials those are important in that time to get money. Also, it can refer to biblical images, but I prefer do not talk about because I do not like talk about religion in school works.  The second is about  Spanish explorations. It  is the image of what the Spanish galleons brings to their king and queen. The words emeralds, amethysts, topazes, cinnamon and gold moiders refer to the first explorations to the new world which is victim of European ambition. Because of its richness was explored damaged, and looted.  The third one is about the British who trade with tyne coal, road-rails, pic-lead, firewood, iron-ware and chip tin trays. A new era has began with the coal. It is about new industry which is the beginning of a modern world. Each image of the different transportations and their cargos are clearly visual.  Our head can visualize each vessel with its materials and the time that represents. It is like if you can touch them with your hands which makes conquers and chages nice to the reader. It is like the author wants to justify each kind of exploration and its benefits for the world.  
On the other hand we have “Anthem for Doomed Youth” which is the image of death of soldiers. Even though its images are related with sounds  produced by  different items or attitudes such as: bells, choirs, rattle,  wailing, and some of them can be related to happy concepts, in an ironic way their meaning have a extreme relationship with death. This poem make me think about war no in a nice way but a social product that its intention is destroy, in this poem, young people lives maybe for an unjustified reason. In the first stanza the image is completely sounded, but the second one is completely visual: glimmers, pallor, pall, flowers, dusk, drawing, and blind. This stanza talks about how young people’s life is finished by war. It is about the consequences of an awful act as war. The contrast reflected in both stanzas makes the reader feel even sadder because its images are not justifying human’s cruel ambition but protesting about the results: young people dying.
The first poem describes the beauty of conquering, but the second one is a protest against war which brings death between young people. The first one is useful; the second one is a crime because it finishes with the future of a nation: youth.
Do in this time above all has importance this topics? Because of this is nice literature. It has not time or place. All the topics continue through out time. Those poems are two reflections of this time situation: conquer and death, useful but painful.

Monday, November 5, 2012

BLOG VIII

 Fighting or Surrender?      

            Life is composing of two mean things: life or death. Each one of us such as humans have problems that could bring us in a deep hole or having the attitude of fighting for get better of that situation. There are two poems that can explain that feelings. I can say that “Hope” written by Lisel Muller is the exact way how I think about adversity. But also “Because I could not stop for death” by Emily Dickinson is the opposite of my ideology of life. 
            Many times we feel deeply defeated by life adversities, but there is always an open window to our problems. Muller says that hope is at any place even if it is insignificant. For me hope is like a window where you can see many solutions to our overwhelming issues. Like Muller say that hope can be at any place or thing: “It sprouts in each occluded eye/ of the many-eyed potato,/  it lives in each earthworm segment surviving cruelty,/ it is the motion that runs from the eyes to the tail of a dog,/ it is the mouth that inflates the longs/ of the child that has just been born” (478). Maybe we could feel tiny when life is to big to hug it, but even if we are small size to confront all life adversities, hope is going to be there for us, and as result we can survive in this cruel world. Hope is just life, and it gives us courage to confront all our fears. Hope is a deeper feeling that shows our soul which makes us loyal to ourselves and others, and also is like poetry because is the mirror of our inner. Muller reaffirms, hope is: “(…) the serum which make us swear/ not to betray one another;/ it is in this poem, trying to speak.” (478)
 Even though hope is an open window to our dark side such feelings and thoughts, there is the surrender. The Dickinson’s poem “Because I could not stop for death” is an idea that I do not embrace because it is give us before start the war against life adversities. I do not believe that we should surrender to the weakness of  living in this hard world. Even though Dickinson states that: “Because I could not stop for Death-/ He kindly stopped for me-/ The Carriage held but just Ourselves-/ And immortality” (488). We should fight because only that part of life can give us immortality. It is through out our actions and courage to confront all our fears. If we are cowards how we can build our heritage. It is the way to that immortality. Death can be a nice and sweet way to stop our dilemma about life, but even though we live short moments of happiness, abundance, and the good side of  life; we cannot surrender to darkness, to the cold world where fears and lack of emotions rule. Death can be the best solution to above all, but it can be a cowardly act that fall into oblivion because death what I can understand in Dickenson poem is suicide which denies courage for living.
Hope is immortality, but death is forgetting, and we should never stop for death.